You are currently using an unsupported browser which could affect the appearance and functionality of this website. Please consider upgrading to the latest version or using alternatives such as Mozilla Firefox, Google Chrome or Microsoft Edge.

Screening for future issues

How to use the Annual Review of Competence Progression (ARCP) and the matrix of educational progression to screen for potential future issues.

The Matrix of Educational Progression is a useful objective tool to benchmark trainees. The table below provides guidance regarding the ARCP outcome for some of the standards, about which there is doubt within the Matrix of Educational Progression.

If a trainee receives an outcome 2 or 3 an educational plan should be set with Specific Measurable Achievable, Realistic and Timely (SMART) targets. The actual time frame should be determined by the original panel following senior local advice. Trainee progress should be assessed at a follow up ARCP.

 

Other specific guidance

 

 

Outcome 2

Outcome 3

Work based assessments

When the number of CBDs and minicex are sufficient but the quality or timing, or evidence of learning is of concern. Specifically trainees should be obtaining WBAs throughout the training year

 

When the number completed is below that noted in the matrix

For persistent inappropriate timing and quality (e.g. insufficient senior clinical input) of WBAs

Simulation training

 

Failure to complete 1 formative OSAT- basic laparoscopy skills

Reflective practice

Quality of reflective practice is poor.

For not completing the number of reflective practice forms as stated in the matrix or where the reflective practice shows ongoing lack of insight

 

Courses

Attendance at Deanery Teachings below the regional guidance. 

Failure to attend recommended courses within the matrix of progression, or demonstrate that content and learning outcomes have been achieved using alternative evidence. 

Persistent failure to achieve attendance targets at regional teaching

Team Observation forms

Some concerns noted by ARCP panel. These are not major nor recurrent.

RCOG guidance for TO forms not followed

Major or recurrent issues noted

Recurrent failure to follow RCOG TO form guidance.

TEF

Non completion of TEF alone will not generate an adverse outcome at ARCP

 

Clinical Governance

Falls below the standard set out in the matrix

Persistently and significantly falls below matrix standard.

Teaching experience

Falls below the standard set out in the matrix

Persistently and significantly falls below matrix standard.

Leadership and management

Falls below the standard set out in the matrix

Persistently and significantly falls below matrix standard.

Presentations Publications

Falls below the standard set out in the matrix

Persistently and significantly falls below matrix standard.